こりゃさすがに国際的な介入が必要だろう？
Should UN Intervention in Myanmar Be Off the Table?U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in February, albeit before violence escalated in Myanmar, that “We will not promote democracy through costly military interventions or by attempting to overthrow authoritarian regimes by force. We have tried these tactics in the past. However well-intentioned, they haven’t worked.” But it’s useful to consider the options. After all, no two interventions are the same.
The risks of armed intervention are obvious. Beijing and Moscow would vehemently oppose it. Yet it seems unlikely that Beijing would suddenly throw its support behind the military junta, so it may not become a proxy war in the way that some imagine
But the risks of not doing more are also considerable. As Burgener put it: “Failure to prevent further escalation of atrocities will cost the world so much more in the longer term than investing now in prevention, especially by Myanmar’s neighbors and the wider region.” Exactly what she meant by “investing” isn’t clear. What is clear is that the situation in Myanmar is worsening and the international community, although with good intentions, is standing, slack-jawed, watching events pass it by. And sanctions, unless China, Japan, and India are willing to act, aren’t going to cut it
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿