反ジェンダー 反共、反動

reactionary

a person who is opposed to political or social change or new ideas:

In political science, a reactionary or reactionist is a person who holds political views that favor a return to the status quo ante, the previous political state of society, which that person believes possessed positive characteristics that are absent from contemporary society

Why is the idea of ‘gender’ provoking backlash the world over? | Judith Butler https://t.co/iD9mORXa98　世界中で起こっている反ジェンダー運動についてバトラーの記事

— mozu (@mozumozumozu) October 23, 2021

 For this reactionary movement, the term “gender” attracts, condenses, and electrifies a diverse set of social and economic anxieties produced by increasing economic precarity under neoliberal regimes, intensifying social inequality, and pandemic shutdown. 

 When gender is thus figured as a foreign invasion, these groups clearly reveal that they are in the business of nation-building. The nation for which they are fighting is built upon white supremacy, the heteronormative family, and a resistance to all critical questioning of norms that have clearly restricted the freedoms and imperiled the lives of so many people.

 Indeed, gender comes to stand for, or is linked with, all kinds of imagined “infiltrations” of the national body – migrants, imports, the disruption of local economics through the effects of globalization. Thus “gender” becomes a phantom, sometimes specified as the “devil” itself, a pure force of destruction threatening God’s creation

以上の説明は・・・「なんだかなあ」、という感じがしないでもないんだけど、要するに、

One reason, then, we need gender studies more than ever is to make sense of this reactionary movement.

反ジェンダーが反動勢力であることはたしか。

In Germany and throughout eastern Europe “genderism” is likened to “communism” or to “totalitarianism”

日本でも反ジェンダーと反共勢力ってのは・・・重なるところもあるのかなああ。

Anti-gender movements are not just reactionary but fascist trends, the kind that support increasingly authoritarian governments..... they are typical of fascist movements that twist rationality to suit hyper-nationalist aims.

　反動だけでなく、権威主義的独裁を支持するファシスト、過激な民族主義者だ、・・・・というんだけど・・・欧州の状況がそんな感じなのかなああ・・・よおわからんねえ。

 They insist that “gender” is an imperialist construct, that it is an “ideology” now being imposed on local cultures of the global south, spuriously drawing on the language of liberation theology and decolonial rhetoric. Or, as the rightwing Italian group Pro Vita maintains, “gender” intensifies the social effects of capitalism whereas the traditional heteronormative family is the last bulwark against social disintegration and anomic individualism.

ここらへんは逆に面白いよなあ。

　反ジェンダー側の理論なんだけど、ジェンダー論ってのは、解放神学や脱植民地主義のレトリックをまとって、特定地域に侵略する帝国主義的な思想だとか、資本主義のもと自分勝手主義で社会がバラバラになっていくことに対して伝統的家族が最後の砦になって抗してきたわけだけど、ジェンダー論はそうした悪しき資本主義の影響を強化して家族をバラバラにしてく、みたいな・・・

　要するに左翼的なレトリックを使って右派がジェンダー論を批判しているわけだね。（ちなみに、ジェンダー肯定派からすれば、伝統的な男女の固定的社会的役割こそ帝国主義的で資本主義の悪い側面の現れ・・・みたいに反論するんだろうな・・・とは思うが）

　このあとも反ジェンダーとファシストをからめて論じているんだけど・・・いまいち説得力がないような・・・結局、反ジェンダーは反動勢力ですよ、というところまでじゃないかなあ、説得力があるのは・・・