I just can't get over this. It's a thing the Washington Post actually published — a thing that is so completely and indefensibly wrong that anyone who has taken a single intro to philosophy course could explain why https://t.co/v5OteD8X5F pic.twitter.com/JBfX6Pb3PD
— Zack Beauchamp (@zackbeauchamp) November 12, 2021
反啓蒙主義者カント。『純粋理性批判』というタイトルだけから想像をたくましくするとこういう作文になるのかな。
— mozu (@mozumozumozu) November 12, 2021
これはWapoの記者もなんだが、教えた学者もわるいんよなあ。
WTH is critical race theory? How a philosophy that inspired Marxism, Nazism, and Jim Crow is making its way into our schools, and what we can doCRT is grounded in critical theory[10] and draws from thinkers such as Antonio Gramsci, Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, and W. E. B. DuBois, as well as the Black Power, Chicano, and radical feminist movements from the 1960s and 1970s
ウィキの解説の フランクフルト学派に影響を受けている、という方がわからなくはない。
Crticial とかカントのCtitique (of pure reason),日本語の「批判」「批評」というのが曲者で、「悪く言う」意味にとってしまいがだけど、おれの言葉でいうと「吟味」なんだよねえ。
辞書的に言っても、
Critical
ADJECTIVE1.
containing or making severe or negative judgments
2.
containing careful or analytical evaluations
a critical dissertation
2つ意味があってどうしても最初の悪く言うほうに引きずられてしまう。
ところが、カントの理性批判というのは理性の吟味なんだよなあ。
で、CRTも
Critical race theory (CRT) is a framework of analysis and an academic movement of civil-rights scholars and activists who seek to examine the intersection of race and law in the United States and to challenge mainstream American liberal approaches to racial justice.
ちゃんとExamineと言っている。米国の人種と法の影響関係の吟味ということだろうね。
Crtical theoryなんかも
Critical theory is any approach to social philosophy that focuses on reflective assessment and critique of society and culture in order to reveal and challenge power structures.
社会や文化の「吟味」でしょう。
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿