時系列で見れば和解の前提を反故にしたという単なるルール違反事例です,内容フォロー不要
— Spica (@Kelangdbn) November 7, 2021
3月17日 事件発覚
3月19日 G氏がK氏との共通の知人を介して謝罪の申し出
3月20日 G氏から非公式謝罪
4月4日〜30日 Open Letter発表と賛同者の募集
7月21日 G氏から公式謝罪https://t.co/rUnHbXcGvV
呉座先生ハブりを要求したこと自体は認めていてわろた(※わろてない)。「3回殴れと言ってない,1回にしろと言った」
— Spica (@Kelangdbn) November 4, 2021
人文系研究者には本OLの文章に解職を想定してないとの読解が期待されるのかもしれませんが,だとすれば学問的存在価値はないですね。独りよがりが過ぎるhttps://t.co/gZ31EBwob6 pic.twitter.com/zk1OXqB2UA
なるほどねえ・・・・陰口はするな、のるな、やめさせよう、とかいう単純なものじゃなくて、むしろ、キャンセルカルチャー推進しているのか?
キャンセルカルチャーについてちょこっと調べようと思ったら・・・・↓・・・・たいへんだわ・・・・やっぱ賛否両論あるわ、こりゃ。
Cancel culture From Wikipedia,
Cancel culture or call-out culture is a modern form of ostracism in which someone is thrust out of social or professional circles – whether it be online, on social media, or in person. Those subject to this ostracism are said to have been "cancelled".[1][a][4] The expression "cancel culture" has mostly negative connotations and is used in debates on free speech and censorship.
A social environment in which publicly boycotting or withdrawing support for people, organizations, etc. regarded as promoting socially unacceptable beliefs is widespread practice.
refers to the popular practice of withdrawing support for (canceling) public figures and companies after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive.
A core characteristic of canceling (relative to other rejections) is that to many (but not all) observers, the canceler's punitive actions appear disproportionate to the magnitude of the transgression. Relatedly, when canceling someone, the canceler bypasses the legal due process. There is no complaint, no trial, no prosecution, no conviction, and no presumption of "innocent until proven guilty." The canceler's judgment that the transgressor is at fault is sufficient to trigger punitive action.
What Is Cancel Culture?Cancel culture is a cultural boycott. It allows "marginalized people to seek accountability where the justice system fails.”A community that unites against someone who has done something unforgivable can be empowering. It can also make people think twice before behaving inappropriately or posting potentially offensive views. But there are also negative effects resulting from cancel culture.The CanceledUnfortunately, canceling often turns into bullying. Like bullying, if you've been canceled, it can make you to feel ostracized, socially isolated, and lonely. And research shows that loneliness is associated with higher anxiety, depression, and suicide ratesAfter seeing so many people canceled, some bystanders can get plagued with fear. They may become overwhelmed with anxiety that people will turn on them. That others will find something into their pasts to use against them.
psychology today
5 Reasons Why People Love Cancel Culture
Research reveals why social mobs enjoy cancelling people.
1. Cancel culture increases social status.
2. Cancel culture reduces the social status of enemies.
3. Cancel culture strengthens social bonds.
4. Cancel culture forces enemies to reveal themselves.
5. Cancel culture produces fast rewards.
CNN
t's time to cancel this talk of 'cancel culture'
Analysis by AJ Willingham, CNN
Where are the anti-cancel culture warriors in Kaepernick jerseys? Where are the anti-cancel culture warriors fighting for men and women who allege wrongdoing at great risk to their own career?
It's very convenient that the same people who want to convince you that cancel culture is real also seem to be the ones determining who is worthy of being saved from such a fate, and who is not.
That's because cancel culture isn't real.
There is accountability. There are legal repercussions. There are tides of public opinion and the pull of the free market. There are also longstanding institutional structures that serve to suppress and threaten those who act against the interests of those with power.
Vox
Why we can’t stop fighting about cancel culture
Is cancel culture a mob mentality, or a long overdue way of speaking truth to power?
By Aja Romano@ajaromano Updated Aug 25, 2020,
“Canceling is a way to acknowledge that you don’t have to have the power to change structural inequality,” Charity Hudley said. “You don’t even have to have the power to change all of public sentiment. But as an individual, you can still have power beyond measure.To Rose, and to many opponents of cancel culture, a vital element of the debate is the belief that other people can change. The difference between cancel culture and a more reconciliatory, transformational approach to a disagreement is “the difference between expecting amends and never letting a wound close,” Rose said. “Between expressing your rage and identifying with it forever.”“I get that, but that’s a really middle-class, white privilege way of coming at this,” Charity Hudley countered when I summarized Rose’s viewpoint for her. “From my point of view, for Black culture and cultures of people who are lower income and disenfranchised, this is the first time you do have a voice in those types of conversations.”
A similar argument was made by a group of over 100 writers and academics including J.K. Rowling and Noam Chomsky, in a letter published in Harper's magazine. They argued that cancel culture had created an "intolerant climate" and had weakened "norms of open debate".
The letter received criticism by those who said the writers were already in positions of power and that cancel culture was meant to give a voice to those with less privilege.
At the heart of many complaints about cancel culture is the idea that there are few ways to make amends once cancel culture says you have done something wrong.
Tarring and feathering
From Wikipedia
A core element of cancel culture, public shaming has been used since societies were first formed. Stocks, or public restraints, were used in medieval Europe up through Colonial America, where Puritans used them to punish criminals. Tarring and feathering was also a form of public corporal punishment used to keep people in line. And during World War II, French women who were deemed traitors had their heads shaved, says Stacey (Barreto) DiLiberto ’03 ’11PhD, a UCF lecturer in philosophy.
“Public shaming is a long-standing public ritual that helped to uphold social bonds and make sure people within communities were equal and understood the norms, and to ensure no one got too high and mighty,” says Amanda Koontz, UCF associate professor of sociology.
Amy Cooper — a white woman who called emergency services regarding Christian Cooper, a Black man, during a viral Central Park dispute about her illegally unleashed dog — has been fired from her job, charged with a misdemeanor for filing a false police report, and faced notoriety and ridicule. Cooper has apologized for her actions, but who determines the sincerity of it? She was dealt real consequences, yet racist incidents continue to happen and appear online daily.
“So often we are told, ‘We must act and speak out, or we are part of the problem,’ and therefore we are not necessarily taught or trained that inaction or not speaking out can be a form of social-justice action,” Koontz says. “At some point, we need to think about ways we can create positive change instead of fueling negative causes.”
Perhaps we all need to take a step back and listen.
Pro
Callout culture allows marginalized people to seek accountability where the justice system fails.
Callout culture gives a voice to disenfranchised or less powerful people.
Callout culture is simply a new form of boycott, a cherished tactic in the civil rights movement, to bring about social change.
Con
Callout culture amounts to online bullying, and can incite violence and threats even worse than the original offense being called out.
Callout culture is not productive and does not bring about social change.
Callout culture is a slippery slope and leads to intolerance in democratic societies as people systematically exclude anyone who disagrees with their views.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿