残って軍隊ともに戦うか、早いところに退避するか？

憲法には非常事態条項がないので、本来の意味での有事法制＝戦時体制は存在しない。「国民保護法」はそれを自治体の災害対策とごちゃごちゃにしてごまかしたもの。戦時体制の指揮権が自治体にあるはずがない。地方政治の発想でウクライナ戦争を語るのはやめたほうがいい。 https://t.co/4ltCDqLUgR

— 池田信夫 (@ikedanob) April 5, 2022

フィンランド人研究者「ロシアに占領されるとどうなるか、Buchaの虐殺をみれば明らかだ。だからこそ、もしロシア軍が国境を越えてフィンランドに侵攻すれば、私は戦うと誓う」 https://t.co/SQ3n4z0Rgk

— H.S. Kim (@xcvbnm67890) April 5, 2022

 Shot Through the Heart

The 31-year-old rail worker Sasha, who really was keeping an eye on Russian positions for the Ukrainian army, was also killed. When he didn’t immediately stop on March 12 following warning shots from a machine gun, a sniper shot him through the heart.

His family found Sasha’s body the next day lying next to an electric box on a sidewalk. Nobody had been allowed to move it, says his father Valentin. And nobody could call him, the father, because the telephones no longer worked.

On that same day, March 12, a number of residents were able to evacuate the town following difficult negotiations with the Russians. Sasha’s wife and five-year-old child were among those who left. Sasha’s father says they are currently somewhere in the Czech Republic and still haven’t learned of Sasha’s death. The little one, though, says Valentin, seems to have had a premonition: "Daddy’s not coming back," he said just before leaving. Sasha and his wife had promised him that "after the war, you’re going to get a sister or a brother," says Valentin.

残って軍隊のために働いた市民は死に、ロシア人と交渉して、退避し、外国に脱出したその家族は生き残ったようですね。

ーーー橋下氏と反橋下論争は議論が噛み合っていないから・・・なにも言わないのがいいのかもしれませんが・・・

　市民としては、残って軍隊ともに戦うか、早いところに退避するか？の選択に迫られ、国としては市民も軍隊とともに戦わせるか、早いところ退避させるか、の選択に迫られる。

　反橋下派は、軍隊ともに戦わせる法を選ぶわけでしょうか？