THREAD
— Richard Walker (@rbsw) February 14, 2024
Taiwan isn’t ready for a Chinese attack
Challenges for new President Lai
- Fmr mil head warns deterrence NOT credible
- Uncertain commitment to asymmetric strategy
- Uncertainty re US supplies
- Divided politics
- ⬆️ openings for Chinese interference
DW special 🎥
1/9 pic.twitter.com/xtiGJqftwp
Warnings from the US
- Former Trump admin official: Taiwan not doing nearly enough
- “Verges on suicidal”
- Argues spending target of 3% GDP too low
- “US will help those who help themselves”
- “Mood in US pretty anti-interventionist”
Copilot
非対称戦略(アシンメトリック ストラテジー)は、敵対的な行動が通常の国家の正規軍隊ではない場合に発生する非正規戦争の形態です。この用語は、ゲリラ戦、反乱、テロリズム、対テロ作戦などとも呼ばれます1。
- Taiwan's new president, Lai Ching-te, faces the challenge of safeguarding Taiwan from Chinese attack, despite increasing threats and intimidation from China.
- Lai's election, with a focus on maintaining the status quo and avoiding declaring independence, has provoked tensions with Beijing, which views him as a separatist criminal.
- Taiwan is perceived as unprepared for military conflict, with concerns raised about its ability to defend itself against a potential Chinese invasion.
- Experts suggest an asymmetric warfare strategy for Taiwan, emphasizing smaller, mobile, survivable, and expendable military systems, along with well-trained troops and a resilient society.
- The role of the United States in supporting Taiwan is highlighted, with concerns about the strain on US-Taiwan relations, and a call for Taiwan to take its defense more seriously to garner continued support.
最低限それだと思いますが
— ウム・クルトゥム (@Palmyra_Zanobia) February 14, 2024
将来的な数と時間を考えればやはりアラビア湾岸諸国モデルが良いと思います。60歳までしか就労ビザは降りず高齢者投資家ビザは高額保証。イスラム国教国でさえ他国のイスラム教徒の永住や帰化は原則認めていないのですから。 https://t.co/aldSXwQsZm
- Historical perspective on immigration: Before 1914, the United States had completely free immigration, widely considered a good thing. However, today, opinions have shifted, with many opposing free immigration due to concerns about the potential influx of immigrants from various countries.
- Inconsistency in views: The speaker highlights the inconsistency in people's views on immigration. While free immigration was deemed beneficial in the past, it is now seen as problematic, especially when considering the impact on welfare and the econ
- Welfare state dilemma: The speaker argues that the shift in perception is tied to the existence of a welfare state. Free immigration to jobs is distinguished from free immigration to welfare, and the speaker contends that both cannot coexist. The presence of a welfare state complicates the dynamics of immigration.
- Paradox of illegal immigration: The speaker introduces a paradoxical idea that illegal Mexican immigration is viewed as beneficial, unlike legal immigration. The rationale is that illegal immigrants do not qualify for welfare benefits, making them more likely to take jobs that others in the country are unwilling to do.
- Socially advantageous acts made illegal: The discussion extends to how bad laws can criminalize socially advantageous acts, pointing to the impact of immigration laws on the morally sound actions of individuals seeking better opportunities, as seen in the case of Mexican immigrants.
罰金でええんちゃう?中国人に「やめて下さい!」は無駄。
— 台湾史.jp (@Formosanhistory) February 14, 2024
正解は
「捨てるな!さもないと罰金10万円!」
シンガポールの罰金地獄がなぜあるのか?そこを考えたらわかる。中国人は「💴で殴れ」。#認識中国 https://t.co/28l5KQkG6K
「優しさにひとつ気がつく ×でなく○で必ず終わる日本語」まる。
Kid, if You Need Booze or Drugs to Enjoy Your Life to the Fullest, You're Doing It Wrong.おれもそう思うな。
これは両者とも発生論の誤謬を犯しているんじゃないかな?なにか信者さんが言っているようだ。 https://t.co/G0RhmcQcZ8
— buvery (@buvery) February 14, 2024
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿