2023年10月15日日曜日

Hamas and IDF Just stop killing civilians! Killing civilians is indefensible, whether done by Hamas or IDF

 

Guardian-reading wokerati reposted ハマスだろうがIDFだろうが民間人殺害は戦争犯罪だな。 


 Guardian-reading wokerati reposted IDFは市民虐殺しているな。
  ハマスとIDFの戦争犯罪が国際法廷で裁かれ、２カ国共存案が推進されればよい。

 

乳幼児の切断した報道したことについてCNN記者が謝罪

 

 

M825A1白リン弾は発煙弾として設計されているので禁止対象とされる焼夷兵器には該当しない。つまり現状では使用に規制が無い。
is Israel using white phosphorus as a weapon on civilians in Gaza Human Rights Watch say these white clouds filmed earlier in the week over the port of Gaza are white phosphorus Munitions but the Israeli military denies using them white phosphorus is a chemical substance that ignites instantly when it comes into contact with oxygen and burns until it's all gone it's incredibly powerful at spreading fires and is poisonous to humans if this chemical rains down on you it causes painful toxic burn turns 00:31 and inhaling it can cause organ damage or even death white phosphorus is not technically a chemical weapon and using it as a smoke screen is allowed in war but detonating it over populated areas in broad daylight is considered a war crime the IDF has told us that they don't use white phosphorus in Gaza and without on the ground analysis it's really hard to know for sure but the Israeli military has been accused of using white phosphorus bombs on civilians in the past and now those concerns are being raised again


Israel has been using white phosphorus in its ongoing military operations in Gaza, putting civilians at unnecessary risk in what amounts to a breach of international humanitarian law, Human Rights Watch has said.


The rights group said that it verified footage taken in Lebanon on Tuesday and in Gaza on Wednesday showing multiple instances of artillery-fired white phosphorus over the Gaza City port, and at two rural locations along the Israel-Lebanon border.

The use of white phosphorus – which burns when exposed to oxygen, creating intense heat and smoke – is not banned outright in warzones under international law. The substance can be legally used on battlefields for marking targets or creating smoke screens.

Human Rights Watch said the use of the white phosphorus in Gaza, one of the world’s most densely populated areas, violated the prohibitions in international humanitarian law against putting civilians at unnecessary risk.


“Any time that white phosphorus is used in crowded civilian areas, it poses a high risk of excruciating burns and lifelong suffering,” said Lama Fakih, the group’s Middle East and North Africa director. “White phosphorus is unlawfully indiscriminate when airburst in populated urban areas, where it can burn down houses and cause egregious harm to civilians.”

 ウィキ

White phosphorus munitions 

Despite the danger, for 2022 the Chemical Weapons Convention did not classify phosphorus bombs as such. Non-governmental international organizations have recorded their use during military conflicts in Syria, Afghanistan, the Gaza Strip, and other war zones. However, the use of phosphorus bombs near populated areas or civilians is still a war crime, as humanitarian law requires military attacks to be selective. The command is obliged to distinguish between civilians and soldiers, as well as civilian and military objects, which is impossible when using such projectiles in populated areas


In a 2005 interview with RAI, Peter Kaiser, spokesman for the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons[74] (an organisation overseeing the CWC and reporting directly to the UN General Assembly), discussed cases where use of WP would potentially fall under the auspices of the CWC:

No it's not forbidden by the CWC if it is used within the context of a military application that does not require or does not intend to use the toxic properties of white phosphorus. White phosphorus is normally used to produce smoke, to camouflage movement.

If that is the purpose for which the white phosphorus is used, then that is considered under the convention legitimate use.

If on the other hand the toxic properties of white phosphorus are specifically intended to be used as a weapon, that, of course, is prohibited, because the way the convention is structured or applied, any chemicals used against humans or animals that cause harm or death through the toxic properties of the chemical are considered chemical weapons.[75]


　白燐弾の使用は戦争犯罪だ、とする報道も多いが、 「特定通常兵器使用禁止制限条約第三議定書」や「化学兵器の開発、生産、貯蔵及び使用の禁止並びに廃棄に関する条約」に違反する、というわけではなく、「戦争においても民間人を殺傷してはいけない」、という国際法に反して、戦争犯罪である、ということのようである。昼日中殺傷能力のある物質を人口が密集する地域で使えば民間人が殺傷される危険があり、それは戦争犯罪だろう、というのがたぶん、理屈。

　「パレスチナ人が『あらゆる手段』で抵抗する権利は認められている」と言っても、人質にとったり民間人を殺したりする権利はないだろう、となんでツッコミをいれなかったのか？
 

  An employee at the Israeli Embassy in China has been stabbed. A foreign suspect is detained Story by The Canadian Press •
Since the war broke out, antisemitic remarks have surged on Chinese social media. Bombarded with hostile messages, the Israeli Embassy in Beijing is filtering comments on its Chinese social media account.
多いのは英国人、少ないのは韓国人
、韓国の人たちは日本でお金使わないで可哀想な米軍性奴隷に寄付でもするのかな？ 憎しみがどんな帰結をうむか目の当たりにしているのにいまだにヘイトを拡散しているんだな。
情弱ネトウヨって、騙されやすいだけじゃなくてそもそも真偽はどうでもいい人が多い
流言飛語、ブルシットの流通拡散が目的 １）親と絡めて紹介されると困る政治家多いんじゃないの？ 
２）国際査読誌に論文を１本もだしてないのけ？ 
３）IR学者で参考になる人は少ない。



英語圏ではよく言われていた記憶があるけどね。  

１）「クルド人」を十把一絡げにしないこと 
２）　ゴミ拾いをしているクルド協会の人たちと問題を話し合うこと。 １）写真ではなにやっているかわからない。 
２）気になったら、ご自身がその場で叱ってあげればいいのでは？
３）一部の人の悪いところばっかみつけて◯◯人は、◯◯学校の生徒は、◯◯出身者はとかやるのが差別主義者、ヘイトグループの常套手段
  １）「ゲイを殺せ」、というイスラム教徒もキリスト教徒もいるが、すべてのイスラム教徒やキリスト教徒がそんなことを言っているわけではない。ゲイと相容れるイスラム教徒もいる。
移住した国で宗教上の理由がゲイを殺した、というイスラム教徒のニュースも私の知る限り聞いたこともない。

ISISの行動をもってイスラム教徒を代表させるのは、日本赤軍の行動をもって日本人を代表させるようなものではないか？

 ２）トランスと女性の利害が対立する場面は少ない。あるのは女性更衣室や風呂、便所に入りたい一部のトランスと入れたくない一部の女性、女性の競技に出たいというトランスと出てもらいたくない女性選手の対立。これらはもう少し議論が成熟するのをみたい。

投稿者 時刻:

0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿

登録: コメントの投稿 (Atom)