2023年8月11日金曜日

” I never make plans that far ahead.　”

一般的にいわれていることでナチやルワンダ虐殺などが有名 


 民族虐殺への１０の段階 

  1.  「わたしら」vs「やつら」
  2.  「チョウセンジン」「クルドジン」
  3. 　差別 
  4. 「ゴキブリ野郎」「寄生虫！」
  5. 組織化　「在特会」
  6.  分断、孤立化 
  7. 準備　最終決着 
  8. 迫害
  9.  抹殺 
  10.  否定「殺してません！」「虐殺はなかった！」
　イスラム教に対する憎悪など欧州の右翼の言説を日本でも繰り広げているわけですね。

 1. Why do we turn a blind eye to such atrocities? Fear of possible allegations of racism is no justification for ignoring acts of this kind! In Austria, too, there are increasing numbers of rapes and attempted rapes by migrants.


2. Does it make any sense to continue talking about ‘isolated cases’ here?


3. Why does the Commission not take preventive measures?

すでに、引用したことがあるが、欧州でも回答はあって、

Answer given by Ms Jourová on behalf of the Commission 6.5.2015
The Commission is aware of the particular situation in Rotherham referred to in the question and condemns it. However, there is no conclusive evidence about a correlation between religion, ethnicity or migrant status and the likelihood of perpetrating rape.


ロザラム児童性的搾取事件は非難されるべきものであるが、宗教、民族、移民の資格と強姦が相関しているかどうかについての決定的な証拠はない、と。


町山智浩 Retweeted

　卑怯で阿呆な指導者たちの犠牲になった兵士たち。その指導者たちまで祀られている。神社は戦争を美化している。そもそも霊魂などないから英霊なんかもない・・・・・・・だとしても、靖国に祀られると信じてこの国の犠牲になって無惨に死んでいった兵士たちがいるわけで、こっそりとでも参拝して手を合わせて頭をさげてきたいね、おれは。 なるほど。


  She Was 300 Yards From the Atomic Bomb Center — and Survived | Op-Docs The New York Times 


 コメント欄パラッとみると・・・心動かされている人が多そうな・・・

 

YVONNE:   Where were you last night?            
RICK:   That's so long ago, I don't remember.     
YVONNE:  Will I see you tonight.　　　　　　　  
RICK:   I never make plans that far ahead.　　   

「今をいきる」リック ・・・いいなああ・・・これだな。


 Guardian-reading wokerati Retweeted
2023-07-24 COVID-19の年代別死者数の推移 

 だったら、なんで希望者だけでも無料で予防接種させないのか？？？・・・・接種券くれればおれはするけどなああ。 BSなんだけど、アメリカのポップカルチャーを脅かすのはKpopじゃないんだ？

   buvery Retweeted

 

04:10
crowds in argentina celebrated the news but they were wronged to assume the british would do nothing because the person in charge of the united kingdom at the time was this lady thatcher was a somewhat controversial prime minister but whether you loved her or hated her there was no denying that she was tough like metal iron for example she immediately declared an exclusion zone around the islands and organized for a task force of over 100 ships to set sail for the falklands the united nations expressed concern at the argentine
04:34
invasion all south american nations apart from chile backed argentina and since the united states had propped up the argentine dictatorship reagan went to thatcher and said could you maybe just let them have the islands and thatcher said no okay here have some weapons 

   


 00:35 when argentina invaded the falkland islands they believed that britain wouldn't even respond 

15:08
argentinian assumptions regarding the next phase quickly fell apart the decision was taken almost immediately that they would have to be retaken a combined land sea and air campaign that 15:44 would have to leave as soon as possible

 the rest of the world reacted to the invasion with shock the un issued resolution 502 calling for an
16:20
immediate withdrawal of argentine forces the us after attempts to broker a peace also came down on the side of the uk they offered arms such as sidewinder air-to-air missiles and the continued use of wide awake airfield on ascension island both of which would prove crucial in the battle to come and although several latin american nations voiced approval for argentina's claim to the islands chile did not

   

 00:38 the relationship hit its lowest point during the Falklands War when President Reagan kept urging the Prime Minister to negotiate a truce a suggestion she flatly rejected 255 soldiers died before Britain retook the islands in time the relationship warmed  


NYT

Reagan, yielding to advisers who regarded Britain’s insistence on retaining sovereignty over the sparsely populated islands as a colonial anachronism, urged the prime minister to show magnanimity rather than force the invading Argentine troops to surrender, and to reach a cease-fire deal providing for a shared Argentine-British role in the islands’ future and a joint American-Brazilian peacekeeping force
“The best chance for peace was before complete Argentine humiliation,” the memo recorded Reagan as saying. “As the U.K. now had the upper hand, it should strike a deal now,” rather than act in a way that further hardened Argentine feelings.



　フォークランドが参考になるかわからないが、反撃はない、と思わせちゃいけない、というのは他の過去の紛争地域の事例でも同じだね。

　アメリカが役に立つか、というと、アメリカと特別の関係にあるイギリスについてもわりに冷たい対応で、武器の提供はあったものの早期休戦を勧めていた、と。

　尖閣で米軍か来て戦ってくれるなんて幻想は抱かないほうがいい。武器と情報の提供だろうね。

　中国の台湾軍事侵攻、あるいは、尖閣侵略などあるか、というと、やれば、いまのロシアと同じで世界の主要国から非難されるし、戦況も不利になるから、合理的に考えればない・・・ただ、不合理でもロシアはうってでたからなああ・・・こればっかりはなんともいえないんだよなあ・・・

　対して朝鮮半島については・・・これもわからん。

　日本としては半島有事については北朝鮮から誤解されないように、不戦宣言、非参戦宣言、非協力宣言を世界に向けてしておくべきだな。

　平和主義なんだから当然だろう？






投稿者 時刻:

0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿

登録: コメントの投稿 (Atom)