2022年9月19日月曜日

Après moi, le déluge 'After me, the flood'


[衝撃] 黒人が東京で経験した事を語るけれど... 


 日本でも差別はあるけど、文句言いたいなら日本語でいいな、と言いたい。

 

中国の『奇跡的な幸運』は、既に尽きた...。今後、深刻かつ持続的な景気後退に見舞われる!?|奥山真司の地政学「アメリカ通信」
 

 アメリカ人が業界の裏話を激白!デビューのきっかけは?日本しか住めない これ誰か翻訳したら? 安倍ちゃんの国葬に反対する人たちに対して怒っている人についてもいえるんじゃ?

 図書館に頼んでおいた「人新世の「資本論」 (集英社新書)  斎藤幸平」が来たのでパラッと読んでみたーーーわりに面白かった。

 以下*がパラパラ読みながら途中でググったやつ

 しかし、コモン化という意味では、大学の授業を公開したらええやん。ごく限定された小さな地域の成功例じゃなくて、隗より始めよ、で身近でできるところからやってほしい。あと自分の大学の図書館のデジタルコモン化とかさあ。
 そのくらいのことができないとすれば、脱成長コミュニズムの前にはその理論が拾っていない大きな現実が立ちはだかっているんではないかな?

 *

 THE ESSENTIAL W ALLERSTEIN pdf

オランダの誤謬

我が亡き後に洪水よ来たれ

外部化とはどういう意味ですか?

The courage of hopefulness Zizek

The change required is not political reform but a transformation of the social relations of production – which entails precisely revolutionary class struggle rather than democratic elections or any other ‘political’ measure in the narrow sense of the term. We do

not vote on who owns what, or about relations in the factory, etc. – such matters remain outside the sphere of the political, and it is illusory to expect that one could effectively change things by ‘extending’ democracy into the economic sphere (by, say, reorganizing the banks to place them under popular control). Radical changes in this domain need to be made outside the sphere of legal ‘rights’.


Socialism or Barbarism

From Wikipedi


Tim Jackson (economist) - Wikipedia







Kate Raworth From Wikipedia

 

 Why it's time for 'Doughnut Economics' | Kate Raworth | TEDxAthens



 In the paradox with which his name came to be associated, Lauderdale argued that there was an inverse correlation between public wealth and private riches such that an increase in the latter often served to diminish the former


Subsumption is the process by which the social relations of production penetrate the labour process itself. Marx distinguishes between the “formal” and “real” subsumption of the labour process by capital.


Capital


Capital is in the first place an accumulation of money and cannot make its appearance in history until the circulation of commodities has given rise to the money relation.


Secondly, the distinction between money which is capital, and money which is money only, arises from the difference in their form of circulation. Money which is acquired in order to buy something is just money, facilitating the exchange of commodities. [Marx represent this as C - M - C or Commodity - Money - Commodity.] On the other hand, capital is money which is used to buy something only in order to sell it again. [Marx represented this as M - C - M.] This means that capital exists only within the process of buying and selling, as money advanced only in order to get it back again.

 

0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿